How We Defend Cyber Cases

Technical Evidence Cuts Both Ways

Cyber prosecutions rest on digital forensics – IP logs, device images, blockchain tracing, and account records assembled by the FBI and HSI. That evidence looks damning until it is examined: attribution is genuinely difficult, shared devices and networks create doubt, and forensic shortcuts create suppression issues.

George Law works with independent digital forensics experts to test the government’s attribution theory, challenge search warrants for overbreadth, and hold the government to its burden of proving who was actually at the keyboard.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

The CFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030) criminalizes unauthorized access to computers – a statute broad enough to reach conduct from intrusion to exceeding authorized access. Penalties escalate sharply with alleged loss or damage.

Blockchain analysis is powerful but not infallible – mixers, shared wallets, and exchange records create attribution gaps. We use independent experts to test every link in the government’s tracing chain.

Free, Confidential Case Review

Charged With A Federal Cyber Crime? Let's Talk.

Attribution can be challenged. Contact us today for a confidential case review.